Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Cross-Sectional Study

Feasibility of Weight-based Tube Voltage and Iodine Delivery Rate for Coronary Artery CT Angiography

Author(s): Ying Wang, Yan Zhang, Aihui Di, Qizheng Wang, Yongye Chen, Huishu Yuan and Ning Lang*

Volume 20, 2024

Published on: 07 March, 2024

Article ID: e15734056287292 Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/0115734056287292240206115534

open_access

Open Access Journals Promotions 2
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of weight-based tube voltage and iodine delivery rate (IDR) for coronary artery CT angiography (CCTA).

Methods: A total of 193 patients (mean age: 58 ± 12 years) with suspected coronary heart disease indicated for CCTA between May and October 2022 were prospectively enrolled. The subjects were divided into five groups according to body weight: < 60 kg, 60 – 69 kg, 70 – 79 kg, 80 – 89 kg, and ≥ 90 kg. The tube voltage and IDR settings of each group were as follows: 70 kVp/0.8 gI/s, 80 kVp/1.0 gI/s, 80 kVp/1.1 gI/s, 100 kVp/1.5 gI/s, and 100 kVp/1.5 gI/s, respectively. Objective image quality data included the CT value and standard deviation (noise) of the aortic root (AR), the proximal left anterior descending branch (LAD), and the distal right coronary artery (RCA), as well as the signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the LAD and RCA. Subjective image quality assessment was performed based on the 18-segment model. Contrast and radiation doses, as well as effective dose (ED), were recorded. All continuous variables were compared using either the one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.

Results: No significant differences were observed in all objective and subjective parameters of image quality between the groups (P > 0.05). However, significant differences in contrast and radiation doses were observed (P < 0.05). The contrast doses across the weight groups were 27 mL, 35 mL, 38 mL, 53 mL, and 53 mL, respectively, while the ED were 1.567 (1.30, 2.197) mSv, 1.53 (1.373, 1.78) mSv, 2.113 (1.963, 2.256) mSv, 4.22 (3.771, 4.483) mSv, and 4.786 (4.339, 5.536) mSv, respectively.

Conclusion: Weight-based tube voltage and IDR yielded consistently high image quality, and allowed for further reduction in contrast and radiation exposure during CCTA for coronary artery diseases.

Keywords: Coronary artery, CT angiography, Tube voltage, Iodine delivery rate, Effective dose, Weight.

[1]
Kalisz K, Halliburton S, Abbara S, et al. Update on cardiovascular applications of multienergy CT. Radiographics 2017; 37(7): 1955-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017170100] [PMID: 29131773]
[2]
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020; 41(3): 407-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425] [PMID: 31504439]
[3]
Lubbers MM, Kock M, Niezen A, et al. Iodixanol versus Iopromide at coronary CT angiography: Lumen opacification and effect on heart rhythm-the randomized IsoCOR trial. Radiology 2018; 286(1): 71-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162779] [PMID: 28809582]
[4]
Wang Y, Chen Y, Liu P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography-a prospective multicenter observational study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32(6): 3808-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08505-5] [PMID: 35103828]
[5]
Mihl C, Maas M, Turek J, et al. Contrast media administration in coronary computed tomography angiography - A systematic review. Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2017; 189(4): 312-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-121609] [PMID: 28264201]
[6]
Albrecht MH, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(5): 2134-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5150-z] [PMID: 29181587]
[7]
Beck KS, Kim JA, Choe YH, et al. 2017 multimodality appropriate use criteria for noninvasive cardiac imaging: Expert consensus of the asian society of cardiovascular imaging. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18(6): 871-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.871] [PMID: 29089819]
[8]
Stocker TJ, Bull R, Buls N, et al. Contrast agent volume for coronary computed tomography angiography imaging in current clinical practice. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022; 16(2): 191-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2021.10.009] [PMID: 34742666]
[9]
LaBounty TM. Reducing radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography: We are not there yet. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13(2): 435-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.017] [PMID: 31202769]
[10]
Scholtz JE, Ghoshhajra B. Advances in cardiac CT contrast injection and acquisition protocols. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017; 7(5): 439-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.06.07] [PMID: 29255688]
[11]
Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016; 10(6): 435-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.002] [PMID: 27780758]
[12]
Liu J, Gao J, Wu R, Zhang Y, Hu L, Hou P. Optimizing contrast medium injection protocol individually with body weight for high-pitch prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29(5): 1115-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0170-x] [PMID: 23288418]
[13]
Mihl C, Kok M, Altintas S, et al. Evaluation of individually body weight adapted contrast media injection in coronary CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85(4): 830-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.031] [PMID: 26971431]
[14]
Mihl C, Kok M, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: Feasible in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(11): 2155-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031] [PMID: 26277498]
[15]
Yin WH, Lu B, Gao JB, et al. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: Results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015; 9(3): 215-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.010] [PMID: 25843243]
[16]
Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Conte E, et al. Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016; 10(4): 322-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.06.003] [PMID: 27357327]
[17]
Han L, Yin W, Lyu B, Li N, Hou Z, Jiang S. [Application feasibility of low tube voltage and lower iodine concentration contrast medium as well as iterative reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2015; 43(3): 234-8.
[PMID: 26269342]
[18]
LaBounty TM, Leipsic J, Poulter R, et al. Coronary CT angiography of patients with a normal body mass index using 80 kVp versus 100 kVp: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor randomized trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(5): W860-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6787] [PMID: 22021533]
[19]
Martin SS, Giovagnoli DA, Abadia AF, et al. Evaluation of a tube voltage–tailored contrast medium injection protocol for coronary CT angiography: Results from the prospective VOLCANIC study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215(5): 1049-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22777] [PMID: 32960669]
[20]
Jia C, Zhong J, Meng X, et al. Image quality and diagnostic value of ultra low-voltage, ultra low-contrast coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2019; 29(7): 3678-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06111-0] [PMID: 30888481]
[21]
Kok M, Mihl C, Hendriks BMF, et al. Optimizing contrast media application in coronary CT angiography at lower tube voltage: Evaluation in a circulation phantom and sixty patients. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85(6): 1068-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.022] [PMID: 27161054]
[22]
Halliburton SS, Tanabe Y, Partovi S, Rajiah P. The role of advanced reconstruction algorithms in cardiac CT. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017; 7(5): 527-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.08.12] [PMID: 29255694]
[23]
Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8(5): 342-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003] [PMID: 25301040]

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy