ONLINE MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION
Authors are requested to electronically submit their papers to this journal for evaluation and submission at https://bentham.manuscriptpoint.com/journals/acctra/View
Submission Instructions. The Manuscript Processing System (MPS) has been designed with the objective of ensuring step-by-step online processing and tracking of manuscripts for authors, editors and the publisher from submission to acceptance and final reproduction.
Through the submission process, this website will guide authors through each stage. The text, tables, and artwork should be uploaded at (https://bentham.manuscriptpoint.com/journals/acctra) in electronic format by the authors. However, the authors who are unable to provide an electronic version or who are facing other difficulties must contact the editorial office by emailing [email protected] to discuss any alternatives. Submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines will unfortunately not be taken into consideration.
Manuscripts must be submitted by one of the authors of the
manuscript, and should not be submitted by anyone on their
behalf. The principal/corresponding author will be required to
submit a Copyright Letter along with the manuscript, on behalf
of all the co-authors (if any). The author(s) will confirm that
the manuscript (or any part of it) has not been published
previously or is not under consideration for publication
elsewhere. Furthermore, any illustration, structure or table
that has been published elsewhere must be reported, and
copyright permission for reproduction must be obtained.
For all online submissions, please provide soft copies of all the
materials (main text in MS Word or Tex/LaTeX),
figures/illustrations in TIFF, PDF or JPEG, and chemical
structures drawn in ChemDraw (CDX)/ISISDraw (TGF) as separate
files, while a PDF version of the entire manuscript must also be
included, embedded with all the
figures/illustrations/tables/chemical structures etc.
It is imperative that before submission, authors should carefully
proofread the files for special characters, mathematical
symbols, Greek letters, equations, tables, references and
images, to ensure that they appear in proper format.
References, figures, tables, structure should be referred to in
the text at the place where they are first discussed. Figure
legends/captions should also be provided.
A successful electronic submission of a manuscript will be
followed by a system-generated acknowledgement to the
principal/corresponding author. Any queries therein should be
addressed to [email protected]
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish in Bentham Science print & online journals will transfer copyright to their work to Bentham Science Publishers. Submission of a manuscript to the respective journals implies that all authors have read and agreed to the content of the Copyright Letter or the Terms and Conditions. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to this journal have not been published and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden, and by submitting the article for publication the authors agree that the publishers have the legal right to take appropriate action against the authors, if plagiarism or fabricated information is discovered. By submitting a manuscript, the authors agree that the copyright of their article is transferred to the publishers if and when the article is accepted for publication. Once submitted to the journal, the author will not withdraw their manuscript at any stage prior to publication.
It is mandatory that a signed copyright letter also be submitted along with the manuscript by the author to whom correspondence is to be addressed. The article should not contain any such material or information that may be unlawful, defamatory, fabricated, plagiarized, or which would, if published, in any way whatsoever, violate the terms and conditions as laid down in the copyright agreement. Copyright letter can be downloaded from the journal's Web site. Download the Copyright letter.
PERMISSION FOR REPRODUCTION
Permission to Reuse Bentham Content
Bentham Science has collaborated with the Copyright Clearance Center to meet our customer’s
licensing, besides rights & permission needs.
The Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink® service makes it faster and easier to secure permission
from Bentham Science’s journal titles. Visit
Journals by Title and locate the desired
content. Then go to the article’s abstract and click on “Rights and Permissions” to open the
RightsLink’s page. If authors can't find the content they are looking for or can't get the rights
they need, please contact us at
[email protected]
Third-Party Permissions
Authors are responsible for managing the inclusion of third-party content as an author/editor of a
work. We refer to 'third party content' as any work that authors haven't developed themselves and
have copied or adapted from other sources. Text, figures, photographs, tables, screenshots, and
other items may be included.
Unless the figure is in the public domain (copyright-free) or permitted for use under Creative Commons or other open licences, the author must get permission from the copyright holder(s).
Published/reproduced material should not be included unless written permission has been obtained from
the copyright holder, which should be forwarded to the Editorial Office in case of acceptance of the
article for publication.
Open Access Articles
Articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted distribution and reproduction in any medium, as long as the work is properly credited/attributed. For more details, please visit Open Access Policy
ARCHIVING POLICIES
SELF-ARCHIVING
By signing the Copyright Letter the authors retain the rights
of self-archiving. Following are the important features of
self-archiving policy of Bentham Science journals
Authors can deposit the first draft of a submitted
article on their personal websites, their
institution’s repositories or any non-commercial
repository for personal use, internal institutional
use or for permitted scholarly posting.
Authors may deposit the ACCEPTED VERSION of the
peer-reviewed article on their personal websites,
their institution’s repository or any non-commercial
repository such as PMC, arXiv after 12 MONTHS
of publication on the journal website. In
addition, an acknowledgement must be given to the
original source of publication and a link should be
inserted to the published article on the
journal's/publisher’s website.
If the research is funded by NIH, Wellcome Trust or
any other Open Access Mandate, authors are allowed
the archiving of published version of manuscripts in
an institutional repository after the mandatory
embargo period. Authors should first contact the
Editorial Office of the journal for information
about depositing a copy of the manuscript to a
repository. Consistent with the copyright agreement,
Bentham Science does not allow archiving of FINAL
PUBLISHED VERSION of manuscripts.
The link to the original source of publication should
be provided by inserting the DOI number of the
article in the following sentence: “The published
manuscript is available at EurekaSelect via
https://www.eurekaselect.com/openurl/content.php?genre=article&doi=.
There is no embargo on the archiving of articles
published under the OPEN ACCESS PLUS (GOLD OPEN
ACCESS) category. Authors are allowed deposition of
such articles on institutional, non-commercial
repositories and personal websites immediately after
publication on the journal website.
LONG-TERM ARCHIVING OF BENTHAM SCIENCE CONTENT
To ensure permanent access to our publications, Bentham
Science has an agreement with Portico to have a
long-term preservation of the content published in its
journals.
MANUSCRIPTS PUBLISHED
The journal publishes original research, peer-reviewed
full-length/mini-review articles, short communications and
drug clinical trial studies written in English. Single topic/
thematic issues may also be considered for publication.
Single Topic Issues
These peer reviewed issues will either contain invited
review/mini-review articles or a mixture of review articles
and drug clinical trial studies. A Single Topic Issue Editor
will offer a short perspective and co-ordinate the
solicitation of manuscripts between 3-5 (for a mini-thematic
Issue) to 6-10 (for a full-length thematic Issue) from
leading experts in the specified area. Authors interested in
editing a single topic issue in an emerging field of
clinical drug development, research, clinical trials,
regulatory affairs and medical education research between
high growth and potentially growing regions may submit their
proposal to the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected]
for consideration.
Conference Proceedings
For proposals to publish conference proceedings in this
journal, please contact us at email: [email protected]
MANUSCRIPT LENGTH
Review Articles
The length of a published comprehensive review article is
from 6000-10000 words with 100 or more references
excluding figures, structures, photographs, schemes,
tables, etc.
Mini-Reviews
Mini-reviews should be 3000- 6000 words with 75 or more
references excluding figures, structures, photographs,
schemes, tables etc.
Research Articles
Research articles should be of 4000-6000 words with 75 or
more references excluding figures, structures,
photographs, schemes, tables, etc.
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews include systematic updates on review
protocols, methods, research and results from all
relevant fields for any studies and updates on already
published issues. The total number of words for a
published systematic review is from 4000 to 6000 words
with 100 or more references excluding figures,
structures, photographs, schemes, tables etc.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses must be reported
according to PRISMA guidelines; (www.prisma-statement.org).
Registration of Systematic Reviews
Bentham Science Publishers supports retrospective
registration of systematic reviews, in a suitable
registry (such as PROSPERO).
The registered systematic review must include the
registration number as the last line of the manuscript
abstract.
Letters/Short Communications
Letters should be 3000-4000 words with 40 or more
references excluding figures, structures, photographs,
schemes, tables etc.
Drug/Device Clinical Trial Studies
Drug or devise clinical trial studies are biomedical or
health-related interventional and/or observational
research studies conducted in phases in human beings
that follow a pre-defined protocol. The study is
intended to find out whether promising approaches to the
disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment are safe
and effective. The maximum total page length for a drug
clinical trial study published in the journal is four
journal pages. Each journal page is on average 900
words. Trial studies should be 4000 to 6000 words
excluding figures, structures, photographs, schemes,
tables etc.
Current Frontiers
The articles should be contributed by eminent experts on
cutting-edge recent developments. They should be written
in the format of mini-reviews (about 4 to 5 pages,
approximately 800 to 850 words per composed page
excluding tables, structures, graphics, figures and
captions) with about 70 references to recent literature.
All pages should be numbered sequentially.
Perspectives
A perspective should provide a short overview of a
research topic relevant to the field. The length of a
published perspective ranges from 1500 to 1800 words
with 20 or more references excluding figures,
structures, photographs, schemes, tables, etc.
There is no restriction on the number of figures, tables or
additional files e.g. video clips, animation and datasets,
that can be included with each article online. Authors
should include all relevant supporting data with each
article (Refer to Supplementary Material section).
MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION
The manuscript should be written in English in a clear, direct
and active style. All pages must be numbered sequentially,
facilitating in the reviewing and editing of the manuscript.
MICROSOFT WORD TEMPLATE
It is advisable that authors prepare their manuscript using
the template available on the Web, which will assist in
preparation of the manuscript according to journal’s format.
ownload
the Template.
SECTIONS IN MANUSCRIPTS
Manuscripts submitted for research and review articles in the
journal should be divided into the following sections:
Title
Title page
Structured Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
Text Organization
Conclusion
List of Abbreviations (if any)
Consent for Publication
Conflict of Interest
Acknowledgements
References
Appendices
Figures/Illustrations (if any)
Chemical Structures (if any)
Tables (if any)
Supportive/Supplementary Material (if any)
Title
The title of the article should be precise and brief and must
not be more than 120 characters. Authors should avoid the
use of non-standard abbreviations and question marks in
titles. The first letter of each word should be in capital
letters except for articles, conjunctions and prepositions.
As recommended by the Reporting guidelines information about
the study should be a part of the title (particularly for
randomized or clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta
analyses).
Authors should also provide a short 'running title with no
more than 80 characters'. Title, running title, byline,
correspondent footnote, and keywords should be written as
presented in the original manuscript.
Title Page
Title page should include paper title, author(s) full name
and affiliation, corresponding author(s) names and complete
affiliation/address, along with phone, fax and email.
Structured Abstract
The abstract of an article should be its clear, concise and
accurate summary, having no more than 250 words, and
including the explicit sub-headings (as in-line or run-in
headings in bold). Use of abbreviations should be avoided
and the references should not be cited in the abstract.
All the original research articles, systematic reviews and
meta analyses must be accompanied with a structured
abstract. Ideally, each abstract should include the
following sub-headings, but these may vary according to
requirements of the article.
Background
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
The headings can vary, but must state the purpose of the
study, details of the participants, measurements, methods,
main findings and conclusion.
The clinical trial studies should have the registration
number at the end of the study.
Graphical Abstract
A graphic should be included with each manuscript for use in
the Table of Contents (TOC). This must be submitted
separately as an electronic file (preferred file types are
EPS, PDF, TIFF, Microsoft Word, PowerPoint and CDX etc.).
A graphical abstract, not exceeding 30 words along with the
illustration, helps to summarize the contents of the
manuscript in a concise pictorial form. It is meant as an
aid for the rapid viewing of the journals' contents and to
help capture the readers’ attention. The graphical abstract
may feature a key structure, reaction, equation, etc.,
that the manuscript elucidates upon. It will be listed along
with the manuscript title, authors’ names and affiliations
in the contents page, typeset within an area of 5 cm by 17
cm, but it will not appear in the article's PDF file or in
print.
Graphical Abstracts should be submitted as a separate file
(must clearly mention graphical abstract within the file)
online via Bentham's Manuscript Processing System.
You can view a few examples of the Graphical Abstracts on our
website.
Keywords
6 to 8 keywords must be provided. Choose important and
relevant keywords that researchers in your field will be
searching for so that your paper will appear in a database
search. The keywords should be contained in the title and
they should appear several times in the article. In
biomedical fields, MeSH terms are a good ‘common vocabulary’
source to draw keywords from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html.
Text Organization
The main text should begin on a separate page and should be
divided into title page, abstract and the main text. The
text may be subdivided further according to the areas to be
discussed, which should be followed by the List of
Abbreviations, Conflict of Interest,
Acknowledgements and Reference sections. For Review
Articles, the manuscript should be divided into title page,
abstract and the main text. The text may be subdivided
further according to the areas to be discussed, which should
be followed by the Acknowledgements and Reference sections.
The Review Article should mention any previous important
recent and old reviews in the field and contain a
comprehensive discussion starting with the general
background of the field. It should then go on to discuss the
salient features of recent developments. The authors should
avoid presenting material which has already been published
in a previous review. The authors are advised to present and
discuss their observations in brief.
For Letters/Research, the manuscript should begin with the
title page and abstract followed by the main text, which
must be structured into separate sections as Introduction,
Materials and Methods, Conclusion, Trial Registration,
Conflict of interest, Acknowledgements and References.
All randomized clinical trials must include a flow diagram
and authors should provide a completed randomized trial
checklist (see CONSORT Flow Diagram and Checklist; www.consort-statement.org)
and a trial protocol.
The manuscript style must be uniform throughout the text and
10 pt Times New Roman font should be used. The full term for
an abbreviation should precede its first appearance in the
text unless it is a standard unit of measurement. The
reference numbers should be given in square brackets in the
text. Italics should be used for Binomial names of organisms
(Genus and Species), for emphasis and for unfamiliar words
or phrases. Non-assimilated words from Latin or other
languages should also be italicized e.g. per se, et
al., etc.
SECTION HEADINGS
Section headings should be numbered sequentially, left
aligned and have the first letter capitalized, starting
with the introduction. Sub-section headings however,
should be in lower-case and italicized with their
initials capitalized. They should be numbered as 1.1,
1.2, etc. A page break may be inserted to keep a heading
along with its text.
INTRODUCTION
The Introduction section should include the background
and aims of the research in a comprehensive manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This section provides details of the methodology used
along with information on any previous efforts with
corresponding references. Any details for further
modifications and research should be included.
Sufficient details should be provided to the reader
about the original data source in order to enable the
analysis, appropriateness and verification of the
results reported in the study.
It is important for the Method Section should be
sufficiently detailed in respect of the data presented,
and the results produced from it. This section should
include all the information and protocol gathered for
the study at the time when it was being written. If the
study is funded or financially supported by an
organization to conduct the research, then it should be
mentioned in the Method Section. Methods must be
result-oriented. The statement regarding the approval by
an independent local, regional or national review
committee (e.g. name of ethic committee and
institutional review board) should be part of the
Methods Section.
EXPERIMENTAL
Repeated information should not be reported in the text
of an article. A calculation section must include
experimental data, facts and practical development from
a theoretical perspective.
RESULTS
The important and main findings of the study should come
first in the Results Section. The tables, figures and
references should be given in sequence to emphasize the
important information or observations related to the
research. The repetition of data in tables and figures
should be avoided. Results should be precise.
DISCUSSION
This should explore the significance of the results of
the work, present a reproducible procedure and emphasis
the importance of the article in the light of recent
developments in the field. Extensive citations and
discussion of published literature should be avoided.
This section of research articles should discuss the implications of the findings in the context of existing research and highlight the study's limitations. The authors should justify the sample size according to the study purpose and methods.
The Results and Discussion may be presented together
under one heading of “Results and Discussion”.
Alternatively, they may be presented under two separate
sections (“Results” section and “Discussion” Sections).
Short sub-headings may be added in each section if
required.
CONCLUSION
A small paragraph summarizing the contents of the
article, presenting the final outcome of the research or
proposing further study on the subject, may be given at
the end of the article under the Conclusion section.
FUNDING
The authors need to declare the funding sources of their
manuscripts clearly by providing the name of the funding
agency or financial support along with allotted
grant/award number in round brackets (if applied), for
instance, "This work was financially supported by [Name
of the funding agency] (Grant number XXX)".
Similarly, if a paper does not have any specific funding
source, and is part of the employment of the authors,
then the name of the employer will be required. Authors
will have to clearly state that the funder was involved
in writing, editing, approval, or decision to publish
the article.
Greek Symbols and Special Characters
Greek symbols and special characters often undergo
formatting changes and get corrupted or lost during
preparation of manuscript for publication. To ensure
that all special characters used are embedded in the
text, these special characters should be inserted as a
symbol but should not be a result of any format styling
(Symbol font face) otherwise they will be lost during
conversion to PDF/XML.
Authors are encouraged to consult reporting guidelines.
These guidelines provide a set of recommendations
comprising a list of items relevant to their specific
research design. Chemical equations, chemical names,
mathematical usage, unit of measurements, chemical and
physical quantity & units must conform to SI and
Chemical Abstracts or IUPAC.
All kinds of measurements should be reported only in
International System of Units (SI).
Appendices
In case there is a need to present lengthy, but essential
methodological details, use appendices, which can be a
part of the article. An appendix must not exceed three
pages (Times New Roman, 10 point fonts, 900 max. words
per page).The information should be provided in a
condensed form, ruling out the need of full sentences. A
single appendix should be titled APPENDIX, while more
than one can be titled APPENDIX A, APPENDIX B, and so
on.
Supportive/Supplementary Material
We do encourage to append supportive material, for
example a PowerPoint file containing information about
the study, a PowerPoint file containing additional
screenshots, a Word, RTF, or PDF document showing the
original instrument(s) used, a video, or the original
data (SAS/SPSS files, Excel files, Access Db files
etc.) provided it is inevitable or
endorsed by the journal's Editor.
Supportive/Supplementary material intended for
publication must be numbered and referred to in the
manuscript but should not be a part of the submitted
paper. In-text citations as well as a section with the
heading "Supportive/Supplementary Material" before the
"References" section should be provided. All
Supportive/Supplementary Material must be listed and a
brief caption line for each file describing its contents
should be included.
Any additional files will be linked to the final
published article in the form supplied by the author,
but will not be displayed within the paper. They will be
made available in exactly the same form as originally
provided only on our Web site. Please also make sure
that each additional file is a single table, figure or
movie (please do not upload linked worksheets or PDF
files larger than one sheet). Supportive/Supplementary
material must be provided in a single zipped file not
larger than 4 MB.
Authors must clearly indicate if these files are not for
publication but meant for the reviewers'/editors'
perusal only.
List of Abbreviations: (if any)
If abbreviations are used in the text either they should
be defined in the text where first used, or a list of
abbreviations can be provided.
RESEARCH ETHICS AND POLICIES
Conflict of Interest
Financial contributions and any potential conflict of interest
must be clearly acknowledged under the heading ‘Conflict of
Interest’. Authors must list the source(s) of funding for the
study. This should be done for each author.
Acknowledgements
Any research assistants or other individuals who assisted with the research but are not listed as authors, such as those who carried out the literature review, produced, computerized, and analyzed the data, or helped with the language, writing, or proofreading of the article, or offered any comments or suggestions, should be acknowledged. Briefly, everyone who has contributed significantly to the improvement of the paper should be acknowledged. It is recommended to mention the "Declared None" if there is no acknowledgement for the study.
Guest or honorary authorship based solely on position (e.g.
research supervisor, departmental head) is discouraged.
The specific requirements for authorship have been defined by the
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Examples of
authors' contributions are: 'designed research/study',
'performed research/study', 'contributed important reagents',
'collected data', 'analyzed data', 'wrote paper' etc. This information must be included in the submitted manuscript as a separate paragraph under the heading 'Authors' Contribution'.
The
corresponding author is responsible for obtaining permission
from all co-authors for the submission of any version of the
manuscript and for any changes in the authorship.
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
Research Involving Humans
All clinical investigations should be conducted according to
the Declaration
of Helsinki principles. For all manuscripts
reporting data from studies involving human participants,
formal review and approval by an appropriate institutional
review board or ethics committee are required.
Patient Consent
Compliance with the guidelines of the International Committee of
Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org)
is recommended, in accordance with the patient’s consent for
research or participation in a study as per the applicable laws
and regulations regarding the privacy and/or security of
personal information, including, but not limited to, the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA")
and other U.S. federal and state laws relating to
confidentiality and security of personally distinguishable
evidence, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (EU)
2016/679 and member state implementing legislation, Canada's
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act,
India's Information Technology Act and related Privacy Rules,
(together "Data Protection and Privacy Laws").
It is the responsibility of the author to ensure that:
Patients' names, initials, or hospital numbers are not
mentioned anywhere in the manuscript (including
figures).
Authors are responsible for obtaining the patient
consent-to-disclose forms for all recognizable patients
in photographs, videos, or other information that may be
published in the Journal, in derivative works, or on the
journal’s web site and for providing the manuscript to
the recognizable patient for review before submission.
The consent-to-disclose form should indicate specific use
(publication in the medical literature in print and
online, with the understanding that patients and the
public will have access) of the patient's information
and any images in figures or videos, and must contain
the patient's signature or that of a legal guardian
along with a statement that the patient or legal
guardian has been offered the opportunity to review the
identifying materials and the accompanying manuscript.
If the manuscript has an individuals’ data, such as
personal details, audio-video material, etc.,
consent should be obtained from that individual. In case
of children, consent should be obtained from the parent
or the legal guardian.
A specific declaration of such approval and
consent-to-disclose form must be made in the copyright
letter and in a stand-alone paragraph at the end of the
article especially in the case of human studies where
inclusion of a statement regarding obtaining the written
informed consent from each subject or subject's guardian
is a must. The original should be retained by the
guarantor or the corresponding author. Editors may
request to provide the original forms by fax or email.
All such case reports require by a proper consent being obtained prior to publishing. Please refer COPE guidelines available at https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/journals%E2%80%99-best-practices-ensuring-consent-publishing-medical-case-reports.
Editors may request that authors provide documentation of the
formal review and recommendation from the institutional review
board or ethics committee responsible for oversight of the
study. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that
do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author
will be held responsible for false statements or failure to
fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
Non-identifiable Images
Anonymous images, that do not identify the individual
directly or indirectly, such as through any identifying
marks or text, do not require formal consent, for example,
X-rays, ultrasound images, pathology slides or laparoscopic
images.
In case consent is not obtained, concealing the identity
through eye bars or blurring the face would not be
acceptable.
Research Involving Animals
For research involving animals, the authors should indicate
whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the
standards set forth in the eighth edition of “Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals” (grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals_prepub.pdf
published by the National Academy of Sciences, The National
Academies Press, Washington, D.C.).
Research work on animals should be carried out in accordance with
the NC3Rs ARRIVE Guidelines. For In Vivo
Experiments, please visit https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines
Authors should clearly state the name of the approval committee,
highlighting that legal and ethical approvals were obtained
prior to initiation of the research work carried out on animals,
and that the experiments were performed in accordance with the
relevant guidelines and regulations stated below.
US authors should cite compliance with the US National
Research Council's "Guide
for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals"
The US Public Health Service's "Policy
on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals"
and "Guide
for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals"
UK authors should conform to UK legislation under the
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment
Regulations (SI 2012/3039).
European authors outside the UK should conform to Directive
2010/63/EU.
Research in animals must adhere to ethical guidelines of
The Basel
Declaration and the International Council for
Laboratory Animal Science (ICLAS) has also published ethical
guidelines.
The manuscript must clearly include a declaration of
compliance with relevant guidelines (e.g. the revised
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the UK and
Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe) and/or relevant
permissions or licences obtained by the IUCN
Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at
Risk of Extinction and the Convention on the Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora..
Research Involving Plants
All experimental research on plants (either cultivated or wild),
should comply with international guidelines. The manuscript
should include a declaration of compliance of field studies with
relevant guidelines and/or relevant permissions or licenses
obtained by the IUCN
Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of
Extinction and the Convention
on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Hazard Study
Any unusual risks associated with the use of any chemicals, procedures, or equipment used in the work must be
explicitly stated by the author in the manuscript, preferably in both the materials and methods section and the
declaration section. For more information, visit The World Medical Association (https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/public-health/chemicals)
UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR
Unethical behavior and misconduct may be pointed out by anyone to
the Editor and Publisher with sufficient evidences. The Editor,
in consultation with the Publisher, will initiate investigation
against this Unethical misconduct, complete the procedure till
an unbiased decision is reached, and maintain confidentiality
throughout the process of the investigation. The Author should
be given the opportunity to reply to all minor or major
accusations.
In case of serious breaches, the employer may be informed where
appropriate, by the Editor/Publisher, after reviewing all
available information and evidences or after seeking help from
experts in that field.
Conclusion
Author(s) and Reviewers must be informed in case of
misinterpretation or mishandling of International
Acceptable Standards
A strict notice should be sent to the author and reviewer
to avoid future unethical misconduct
An Editorial on the reported misconduct should be
published or official notice of unethical behavior
should be posted on the website
Official letter about this misconduct should be issued to
the Head of Departments, Funding Agencies of the accused
author and the reviewer, as well as Abstracting &
Indexing Agencies.
Where required, retraction and withdrawal of publication
may be undertaken from the Publisher’s journal in
discussion with the Head of the Department of the author
or reviewer, and other higher authorities should be
informed
The Publisher may impose restrictions for some period on
future publications from the accused author in the
journals
Consent for Publication
If the manuscript has an individuals’ data, such as personal
detail, audio-video material etc., consent should be obtained
from that individual. In case of children, consent should be
obtained from the parent or the legal guardian.
All such case reports should be followed by a proper consent
prior to publishing.
RANDOMIZED DRUG CLINICAL TRIAL STUDIES
Randomized drug clinical trial studies are biomedical or
health-related interventional and/or observational research studies
conducted in phases in human beings who are randomly allocated to
receive or not receive a preventive, therapeutic, or diagnostic
intervention that follows a pre-defined protocol. The study is
intended to determine the safety and efficacy of approaches to
disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment.
Authors of randomized controlled trials are encouraged to submit
trial protocols along with their manuscripts. All clinical trials
must be registered (before recruitment of the first participant) at
an appropriate online public trial registry that must be independent
of for-profit interest (e.g.,www.clinicaltrials.gov).
If you wish the editor(s) to consider an unregistered trial, please
explain briefly why the trial has not been registered.
All randomized clinical trials should include a flow diagram
and authors should provide a completed randomized trial
checklist (see CONSORT Flow Diagram and Checklist; www.consort-statement.org)
and a trial protocol. For further details, please visit complete
guidelines at:
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html
Studies of diagnostic accuracy must be reported according to
STARD guidelines; (http://www.stard-statement.org)
Observational studies (cohort, case-control, or
cross-sectional designs) must be reported according to the
STROBE statement, and should be submitted with their
protocols; (www.strobe-statement.org).
Genetic association studies must be reported according to
STREGA guidelines; (www.medicine.uottawa.ca)
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses must be reported
according to PRISMA guidelines; (www.prisma-statement.org)
To find the reporting guidelines see (http://
www.equator-network.org)
Important points to remember while submitting clinical trials:
Each manuscript should clearly state an objective or
hypothesis; the design and methods (including the study
setting and dates, patients or participants with inclusion
and exclusion criteria, or data sources, and how these were
selected for the study); the essential features of any
interventions; the main outcome measures; the main results
of the study; a comment section placing the results in
context with the published literature and addressing study
limitations; and the conclusions. Data included in research
reports must be original.
Trial registry name, registration identification number, and
the URL for the registry should be included at the end of
the abstract and also in the space provided on the online
manuscript submission form. If your research article reports
the results of a controlled health care intervention, list
the trial registry, along with the unique identifying number
(Please note that there should be no space between the
letters and numbers of your trial registration number).
Studies designed for other purposes, such as to study
pharmacokinetics or major toxicity (e.g., phase 1 trials),
are exempted.
All reports of randomized trials should include a section
entitled “Randomization and Masking”, within the Methods
section.
The manuscript must include a statement identifying the
institutional and/or licensing committee that has approved
the experiments, including any relevant details.
The SI system of units and the recommended international
non-proprietary name (rINN) for drug names must be used.
Kindly ensure that the dose, route, and frequency of
administration of any drug you mention are correct.
Please ensure that the clinical trials sponsored by
pharmaceutical companies follow the guidelines on good
publication practice: (http://www.gpp-guidelines.org)
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not
comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be
held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the
above-mentioned requirements.
REFERENCES
References should be submitted preferably in the ACS or Vancouver
style. All references must be complete and accurate. The reference
numbers must be finalized and the bibliography must be fully
formatted before submission.
The references should be relevant to the study and should refer to
the original research sources. Self-citation and self-interest
should be avoided by the authors, editors and peer-reviewers.
See below few examples of references listed in the ACS and Vancouver
Style:
ACS Style
In ACS style, all references should be numbered sequentially [in
square brackets] in the text and listed in the same numerical
order in the reference section. Superscript in the in-text
citations and reference section should be avoided.
Reference Lists
Different reference formats have different rules for
citation. See below for some common format examples.
Journal Article
The minimum required information for a journal article
reference is author, abbreviated journal title, year,
publication, volume number, and initial page of cited
article, though complete pagination is possible. Journal
abbreviation and volume are italicized.
Year of publication is bold. All authors must
be cited and there should be no use of the phrase et al.
Journal abbreviations should follow the Index
Medicus/MEDLINE.
Bard, M.; Woods, R.A.; Bartón, D.H.; Corrie, J.E.;
Widdowson, D.A. Sterol mutants of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae: chromatographic analyses.
Lipids, 1977, 12(8),
645-654.
Zhang, W.; Brombosz, S.M.; Mendoza, J.L.; Moore, J.S.
A high-yield, one-step synthesis of o-phenylene
ethynylene cyclic trimer via
precipitation-driven alkyne metathesis. J.
Org. Chem., 2005, 70,
10198-10201.
Book Reference
Crabtree, R.H. The Organometallic Chemistry
of the Transition Metals, 3rd
ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001.
Book Chapter Reference
Wheeler, D.M.S.; Wheeler, M.M. D. Stereoselective
Syntheses of Doxorubicin and Related Compounds In:
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry;
Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science B. V:
Amsterdam, 1994; Vol. 14,
pp. 3-46.
Conference Proceedings
Jakeman, D.L.; Withers, S.G.E. In: Carbohydrate
Bioengineering: Interdisciplinary Approaches,
Proceedings of the 4th Carbohydrate
Bioengineering Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden, June
10-13, 2001; Teeri, T.T.; Svensson, B.; Gilbert,
H.J.; Feizi, T., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry:
Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 3-8.
URL(WebPage)
National Library of Medicine. Specialized Information
Services: Toxicology and Environmental Health. sis.nlm.nih.gov/Tox/ToxMain.html
(Accessed May 23, 2004).
Patent
Hoch, J.A.; Huang, S. Screening methods for the
identification of novel antibiotics. U.S. Patent
6,043,045, March 28, 2000.
Thesis
Mackel, H. Capturing the Spectra of Silicon
Solar Cells. PhD Thesis, The Australian
National University: Canberra, December 2004.
E-citations
Citations for articles/material published exclusively
online or in open access (free-to-view), must
contain the accurate Web addresses (URLs) at the end
of the reference(s), except those posted on an
author’s Web site (unless editorially essential),
e.g. ‘Reference: Available from: URL’.
Some important points to remember
All authors must be cited and there should be no use
of the phrase et al.
Date of access should be provided for online
citations.
Punctuation should be properly applied as mentioned
in the examples given above.
Abstracts, unpublished data and personal
communications (which can only be included if prior
permission has been obtained) should not be given in
the references section. The details may however
appear in the footnotes.
The authors are encouraged to use a recent version of
EndNote (version 5 and above) or Reference Manager
(version 10) when formatting their reference list,
as this allows references to be automatically
extracted.
Vancouver Style
In Vancouver style, all references should be numbered
sequentially [in square brackets] in the text and listed in the
same numerical order in the reference section. Punctuation
should be properly applied as mentioned in the examples given
above.
Reference Lists
Different reference formats have different rules for
citation. See below for some common format examples.
Journal Article
The required information for a journal article is author,
abbreviated journal title, year, publication, volume number,
and initial page of cited article, though complete
pagination is possible. It is necessary to list all authors
if the total number of author is six or less and for more
than six authors use three authors and then et al (the term
"et al." should be in italics). Journal
abbreviations should follow the Index Medicus/MEDLINE.
Capitalize the first letter of the first word in the title.
The rest of the title is in lower-case, with the exception
of proper names.
Al-Habian A, Harikumar PE, Stocker CJ, Langlands K,
Selway JL. Histochemical and immunohistochemical
evaluation of mouse skin histology: comparison of
fixation with neutral buffered formalin and
alcoholic formalin. J Histotechnol. 2014
Dec;37(4):115-24.
Guilbert TW, Morgan WJ, Zeiger RS, Mauger DT, Boehmer
SJ, Szefler SJ, et al. Long-term inhaled
corticosteroids in preschool children at high risk
for asthma. N Engl J Med. 2006 May
11;354(19):1985-1997.
Edited Book
Blaxter PS, Farnsworth TP. Social health and class
inequalities. In: Carter C, Peel JR, Eds. Equalities
and inequalities in health. 2nd ed. London: Academic
Press 1976; pp. 165-78.
Chapter in a Book
Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke.
In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, Eds. Hypertension:
pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd ed.
New York: Raven Press 1995; pp. 465-78.
Patent
Larsen CE, Trip R, Johnson CR. Methods for procedures
related to the electrophysiology of the heart. US
Patent 5529067, 1995.
Conference Proceedings
Kimura J, Shibasaki H, Eds. Recent advances in
clinical neurophysiology. Proceedings of the 10th
International Congress of EMG and Clinical
Neurophysiology; 1995 Oct 15-19; Kyoto, Japan.
Amsterdam: Elsevier 1996.
Thesis and Dissertation
Borkowski MM. Infant sleep and feeding: a telephone
survey of Hispanic Americans. PhD dissertation.
Mount Pleasant (MI): Central Michigan University
2002.
URL(WebPage)
Aylin P, Bottle A, Jarman B, Elliott, P. Paediatric
cardiac surgical mortality in England after Bristol:
descriptive analysis of hospital episode statistics
1991-2002. BMJ [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Oct 9;
[cited: 15 October 2004]; 329: [about 10 screens].
Available from: sis.nlm.nih.gov/Tox/ToxMain.html
Electronic Material
Journal Article in Electronic Format
Frangioni G, Bianchi S, Fuzzi G, Borgioli G. Dynamics
of hepatic melanogenesis in newts in recovery phase
from hypoxia. Open Zoo J 2009; 2: 1-7. Available
from: https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOZJ-2-1
[cited: 26th Jan 2009]
Abood S. Quality improvement initiative in nursing
homes: the ANA acts in an advisory role. Am J Nurs
[serial on the Internet]. June 2002 [cited: 12th
Aug 2002]; 102(6): [about 3 p.]. Available from: www.nursingworld.org/AJN/2002/june/Wawatch.htm.
Some important points to remember
Date of access should be provided for online
citations.
Avoid using superscript in the in-text citations and
reference section.
Abstracts, unpublished data and personal
communications (which can only be included if prior
permission has been obtained) should not be given in
the references section. The details may however
appear in the footnotes.
The authors are encouraged to use a recent version of
EndNote (version 5 and above) or Reference Manager
(version 10) when formatting their reference list,
as this allows references to be automatically
extracted.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS
The source of data and materials should be mentioned in the
manuscript, in support of the findings. Sharing research data is
integral to its transparency and reproducibility. Data sharing
involves the citation and availability of data that support the
findings of the research.
Bentham Science encourages authors to share the source of data and
materials in the manuscript, in support of the findings.
Research Data Policy Types:
The four types of research data policies are mentioned below.
Case 1: Data sharing and data
citation
Case 2: Data sharing and its evidence
Case 3: Statement for Data sharing
and data availability
Case 4: Data sharing, evidence of
data sharing and data for peer-review
Case 1: Data Sharing and Data Citation
Wherever appropriate and possible, the journal encourages authors
to publish data to support their research findings in a public
repository. Any datasets mentioned in the article that are
available in external repositories should be cited.
How to Cite the Data?
Whether the data was developed by the author(s) or researcher(s),
all publicly available data referenced in the preparation of an
article should be cited in the text and reference list. The
references relating to the data availability should be presented
in the following format:
Example: Name of author(s), the title of data set, data
repository, document version (e.g., most recent updated
version), Digital Object Identifier (DOI), and Bentham Science
reference style should be included in data citations.
Case 2: Data Sharing and Its Evidence
When authors submit a paper to a journal, the authors agree that
the data provided in the publication, including the relevant raw
data, will be freely available to any researcher who wants to
use these for non-commercial reasons without jeopardising
participant anonymity.
Case 3: Statement for Data Sharing and Data
Availability
Data availability declarations are required under Bentham Science
research data policy types.
The statement relating to the data availability should be
presented in the following format under a separate section for
‘Availability of Data and Materials’ in the manuscript:
The authors confirm that the data
supporting the findings of this study are available
within the article and its supplementary materials.
The data that support the findings of this
study are available from the corresponding author,
[author initials], on special request.
The datasets generated or analysed during
the current study are not publicly available due to
[mention the reason(s)].
Authors who do not wish to share their
data should clearly state that the data will not be
shared, and thus mention as ‘Not applicable’.
The statement relating to the data should
be presented in the following format:
"The data supporting the findings of the article is
available in the [repository name] at [URL], reference
number [reference number]”.
Additional Data Availability Statements
Authors can add or change the statement(s) above, to fit their
work the best. Depending on the nature of the research, several
assertions may need to be merged.
Case 4: Data Sharing, Evidence of Data
Sharing and Data for Peer-Review
All datasets on which the paper's conclusions are based must be
made accessible to reviewers and readers, according to the
journal's rules. Prior to peer review, authors must either
deposit their datasets in publicly accessible repositories or
provide them as supplementary materials with their submission. For further details, please visit complete guidelines at: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html
Data Access and Retention
Authors may provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data. if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
FIGURES/TABLES
FIGURES/ILLUSTRATIONS
All authors must strictly follow the guidelines below for
preparing illustrations for publication in
Applied
Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory
Affairs
. If the figures are found to be
sub-standard, then the manuscripts will be rejected.
The authors are expected to submit good quality figure(s) in
PDF, PPT, MS Word, TIFF or JPEG versions, which, if required,
should be improved yourself or by professional graphic designers
of your organization/country. You may even consider approaching
our contracted service providers Eureka
Science for Graphics Enhancement Services.
The Graphics Designing team at Eureka Science can assist in
improving the quality of your images at affordable rates. Eureka
Science has contracted special rates with us of US $135 for the
improvement of up to five figures, with any additional figures
being charged at US $20 each.
The quality of Graphic Enhancement Services offered by Eureka
Science can be viewed at http://www.eureka-science.com/images/Binder1.pdf,
along with valuable feedback on their services at http://www.eureka-science.com/testimonials.php.
You may contact Eureka Science at [email protected]
Note: Availing Graphics Enhancement Services does not
guarantee acceptance of the manuscript for publication. The
final acceptance/decision on the manuscript is taken by the
EiC.
Guideline for Figures/Illustrations
Illustrations must be provided according to the following
guideline:
Illustrations should be embedded in the text file,
and must be numbered consecutively in the order of
their appearance. Each figure should include only a
single illustration which should be cropped to
minimize the amount of space occupied by the
illustration.
If a figure is in separate parts, all parts of the
figure must be provided in a single composite
illustration file.
Photographs should be provided with a scale bar if
appropriate, as well as high-resolution component
files.
All the numbers, symbols and letters in figures
should be consistent and clear throughout and large
enough to remain readable when the size is reduced
for publication.
It must be ensured to cite each figure in the text in
sequence.
Scaling/Resolution
Line Art image type is normally an image based on lines and
text. It does not contain tonal or shaded areas. The
preferred file format should be TIFF or EPS, with the color
mode being Monochrome 1-bit or RGB, in a resolution of
900-1200 dpi.
Halftone image type is a continuous tone photograph
containing no text. It should have the preferred file format
TIFF, with color mode being RGB or Grayscale, in a
resolution of 300 dpi.
Combination image type is an image containing halftone , text
or line art elements. It should have the preferred file
format TIFF, with color mode being RGB or Grayscale, in a
resolution of 500-900 dpi.
Formats
Illustrations may be submitted in the following file formats:
Illustrator
EPS (preferred format for diagrams)
PDF (also especially suitable for
diagrams)
PNG (preferred format for photos or
images)
Microsoft Word (version 5 and above;
figures must be a single page)
PowerPoint (figures must be a single
page)
TIFF
JPEG (conversion should be done using
the original file)
BMP
CDX (ChemDraw)
TGF (ISISDraw)
Bentham Science does not process figures submitted in GIF
format.
For TIFF or EPS figures with considerably large file size
restricting the file size in online submissions is
advisable. Authors may therefore convert to JPEG format
before submission as this results in significantly reduced
file size and upload time, while retaining acceptable
quality. JPEG is a ‘lossy’ format. However, in order to
maintain acceptable image quality, it is recommended that
JPEG files are saved at High or Maximum quality.
Zipit or Stuffit tools should not be used to compress files
prior to submission as the resulting compression through
these tools is always negligible.
Please refrain from supplying:
Graphics embedded in word processor (spreadsheet,
presentation) document.
Optimized files optimized for screen use (like GIF,
BMP, PICT, WPG) because of the low resolution.
Files with too low a resolution.
Graphics that are disproportionately large for the
content.
Technical Requirements for Graphic/Figure Submissions
Requirement |
Width = 8.5 inches (In-between the
required size) |
Height = 11 inches (In-between the
required size) |
Pixels/Inches = 300 (minimum dpi) |
All figures should be in vector scale
(except half tone, photograph.) |
Image Conversion Tools
There are many software packages, many of them freeware
or shareware, capable of converting to and from
different graphics formats, including PNG.
General tools for image conversion include Graphic
Converter on the Macintosh, Paint Shop Pro, for Windows,
and ImageMagick, available on Macintosh, Windows and
UNIX platforms.
Bitmap images (e.g. screenshots) should not be converted
to EPS as they result in a much larger file size than
the equivalent JPEG, TIFF, PNG or BMP, and poor quality.
EPS should only be used for images produced by
vector-drawing applications such as Adobe Illustrator or
CorelDraw. Most vector-drawing applications can be saved
in, or exported as, EPS format. If the images were
originally prepared in an Office application, such as
Word or PowerPoint, original Office files should be
directly uploaded to the site, instead of being
converted to JPEG or another format of low quality.
Color Figures/Illustrations
The cost for color figures/plates/illustrations
is US$ 540 per article for up to 3
color pages and subsequently US$ 215.00
per page for any additional color pages.
Color figures should be supplied in CMYK and not
in RGB colors.
Note for authors To maintain publication
quality, figures submitted in color will be published in
color only.
Chemical Structures (if any)
Chemical structures must be prepared in ChemDraw/CDX and
provided as separate file.
Structure Drawing Preferences
[As according to the ACS style sheet]
Drawing
Settings
|
Chain angle |
120° |
Bond spacing |
18% of width |
Fixed length |
14.4 pt (0.500cm, 0.2in) |
Bold width |
2.0 pt (0.071cm, 0.0278in) |
Line width |
0.6 pt (0.021cm, 0.0084in) |
Margin width |
1.6 pt (0.096cm) |
Hash spacing |
2.5 pt (0.088cm, 0.0347in) |
Text
settings
|
Font |
Times New Roman |
Size |
10 pt |
Under the
Preference Choose
|
Units |
points |
Tolerances |
3 pixels |
Under
Page Setup Use
|
Paper |
US letter |
Scale |
100% |
Tables
Data Tables should be submitted in Microsoft Word
table format.
Each table should include a title/caption being
explanatory in itself with respect to the details
discussed in the table. Detailed legends may then
follow.
Table number in bold font i.e. Table 1,
should follow a title. The title should be in small
case with the first letter in caps. A full stop
should be placed at the end of the title.
Tables should be embedded in the text exactly
according to their appropriate placement in the
submitted manuscript.
Columns and rows of data should be made visibly
distinct by ensuring that the borders of each cell
are displayed as black lines.
Tables should be numbered in Arabic numerals
sequentially in order of their citation in the body
of the text.
If a reference is cited in both the table and text,
please insert a lettered footnote in the table to
refer to the numbered reference in the text.
Tabular data provided as additional files can be
submitted as an Excel spreadsheet.
It is adequate to present data in Tables to avoid
unnecessary repetition and reduce the length of the
text.
The citation of each table in the text must be
ensured.
Symbols and nonstandard abbreviations should be
explained in the end of the text.
All references should be numbered sequentially [in
square brackets] in the table and listed in the same
numerical order in the reference section.
AUTHORSHIP
AUTHORSHIP CRITERIA
Bentham Science Publishers requires that all
individuals listed as authors must have made a
substantial contribution to the design, performance,
analysis, or reporting of the work. The role of
authors is judged on the basis of ICMJE and COPE guidelines.
Authorship Declaration
All contributing authors are required to sign a
copyright letter, mentioning complete details,
including full name, affiliation, email address,
ORCID ID and their role in the article. After
successful electronic submission of a manuscript, a
system-generated acknowledgement will be sent to all
authors on their provided email addresses.
AUTHORS AND INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS
The Corresponding Author must provide a final list of authors at the time of submission, ensuring the correct sequence of the names of authors, which will not be considered for any addition, deletion or rearrangement after final submission of the manuscript. The
email address of the principal author should be
provided with an asterisk. However, the complete
address, business telephone numbers, fax numbers and
e-mail address of the corresponding author must be
stated to receive correspondence and galley proofs.
Bentham Science Publishers recommends that all
contributors regularly update their profiles on
SCOPUS/ORCID and other databases.
The corresponding author must have the approval of all other listed authors for the submission and publication of all versions of the manuscript.
AUTHOR IDENTIFICATION
Authors are strongly recommended to use their ORCID
ID when submitting an article for consideration.
Alternatively, they can acquire an ORCID ID via the
submission process. For more information about ORCID
IDs, visit here.
CHANGES TO AUTHORSHIP
At the time of initial submission, the finalized list
of authors in correct sequence should be provided,
which will not be changed once the publication
process has started.
If any change is essential, then it can only be done
after the approval of the Editor-in-Chief upon
receiving the following details from the
corresponding author:
- The reason for the change in the author list
and/or their sequence
- A proper justification should be provided
for changes in authorship.
- Correction of existing names should be
accompanied by a notice to the
Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
- A written confirmation from all the co-authors
is a prerequisite for any amendment or removal.
Any amendment to the authors' list will only be considered and approved by the Editor-in-Chief after complete verification. Publication of the manuscript will be withheld during consideration of the request. However, if the manuscript has already been published online, requests approved thereafter by the Editor-in-Chief will result in an erratum or corrigendum. The corresponding author is responsible for obtaining permission from all co-authors for any changes in the authorship.
Here is some advice by COPE on authorship issues. Bentham strives to follow these guidelines.
AUTHORSHIP AND AI TOOLS
Bentham Science Publishers recognizes that authors use a variety of tools for preparing articles related to their scientific works, ranging from simple ones to very sophisticated ones.
According to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines, "AI tools cannot meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work. As non-legal entities, they cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements".
The pertinence of such tools may vary and evolve with public opinion, due to which the use of AI-powered language tools has led to a significant debate. These tools may generate useful results, but they can also lead to errors or misleading results; therefore, it is important to know which tools were used for evaluating and interpreting a particular scientific work.
Considering the above we require that:
- The authors to report any significant use of such tools in their works, such as instruments and software along with text-to-text generative AI consistent with subject standards for methodology.
- All co-authors should sign a declaration that they take full responsibility for all of its contents, regardless of how the contents were generated. Inappropriate language, plagiarized and biased contents, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content generated by AI language tools and the relevant results reported in scientific works are the full and shared responsibility of all the authors, including co-authors.
- AI language tools should not be listed as an author; instead, authors should follow clause (1) above.
General Advice:
Advice on how to spot authorship problems
Before Publication:
Corresponding author requests addition of extra author before publication
Corresponding author requests removal of the author before publication
After publication:
Request for addition of extra author after publication
Request for removal of author after publication
NON-AUTHOR CONTRIBUTORS
Activities such as the acquisition of funding,
general supervision of a research group or general
administrative support, writing assistance,
technical editing, language editing, and
proofreading alone do not qualify any contributor
for authorship. Such contributors may be
acknowledged individually or together as a group in
the acknowledgement section. Further details for
writing acknowledgements are available here.
Persons not meeting authorship criteria can be
acknowledged in the acknowledgement section of the
article rather than being enlisted as authors.
GUEST OR HONORARY AUTHORSHIP
All contributing authors should contribute
substantially to the article and sign the copyright
letter. Bentham Science Publishers discourages
authorship based solely on position (e.g., a
research supervisor or a departmental head). We use
COPE
guidelines for identifying any suspected
ghost, guest or gift authorship.
LANGUAGE AND EDITING
Manuscripts containing language inconsistencies will not be
published. Authors should seek professional assistance for
correction of grammatical, scientific and typographical errors
before submission of the revised version of the article for
publication. Professional editing services may also be sought by
the team available at Bentham
Science.
PROOF CORRECTIONS
Authors will receive page proofs of their accepted paper
before publications. To avoid delays in publication, proofs
should be checked immediately for typographical errors and
returned within 48 hours. Major changes are not
acceptable at the proof stage.
The corresponding author will be solely responsible for
ensuring that the revised version of the manuscript
incorporating all the submitted corrections receives the
approval of all the co-authors of the manuscript.
PAGE CHARGES/QUICK TRACK PUBLICATION
PAGE CHARGES
No page charges will be levied to authors for the publication
of their article. However, the authors may decide for some
paid-for editorial services such as open access publication
and/or a faster overall publication for their article(s).
QUICK TRACK PUBLICATION
For this journal an optional fast publication fee-based
service called QUICK TRACK is available to authors for their
submitted manuscripts.
QUICK TRACK allows online publication within 2 weeks of
receipt of the final approved galley proofs from the
authors. Similarly the manuscript can be published in the
next forthcoming PRINT issue of the journal. The total
publication time, from date of first receipt of manuscript
to its online publication is 12 weeks, subject to its
acceptance by the referees and modification (if any) by the
authors within one week.
The author will be initially charged a small fee on receipt
of the agreement form for Quick Track publication to partially cover the initial costs incurred for expedited processing of the
submitted manuscript. Later, the full Quick Track publication fee
(US$ 52 per composed page charges) will be payable in
advance, after acceptance of the manuscript, before online
publication of the article. However, if the article is
rejected at the peer-review stage, then the US$ 52 per
composed page charges will not be charged.
Please note that whether the author opts for the QUICK TRACK
facility or not, standard reviewing practices will be
followed, which will not in any way affect the acceptance or
rejection of the manuscript by the reviewers.
Authors who have availed QUICK TRACK services in a BSP
journal will be entitled for an exclusive 30% discount if
they again wish to avail the same services in any Bentham
journal.
For more information please contact the Editorial Office by
e-mail at [email protected].
Bentham Science offers a 50% discount off the Quick Track
Publication Fee for manuscripts of all corresponding authors
who reside in countries which are categorized as low-income
economies by the World Bank. To see if you qualify to the
discount, please refer to the complete list of these
countries click
here.
REFUND POLICY
Bentham Science offers three major services related to its publications:
- Subscription services (to subscribers, institutes, libraries, customers, etc.): Involving access to published content based on certain charges for corporates, academic institutes, and individuals.
- Editorial / Author Pre-publication services (to editors, authors, etc.): Quick track processing, language editing, etc.
- Editorial / Author Post-publication Promotional Services (to authors, institutions and organizations): Open Access Plus, Animated Abstracts, Sharing PDF on KUDOS, reprints, etc.
Since these services are optional in nature and are offered for specific services rendered, hence refunds are not allowed against the availed and charged services, except under special cases.
OPEN ACCESS PLUS (GOLD OPEN ACCESS)/REPRINTS
OPEN ACCESS PLUS (GOLD OPEN ACCESS)
Bentham Science also offers authors the choice of “Open
Access Plus (Gold Open Access)” publication of articles at a
fee of US$ 400 per article. This paid service
allows for articles to be disseminated to a much wider
audience, on the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International Public License
(CC-BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).
Authors are asked to indicate whether or not they wish to
pay to have their article made more widely available on this
“Open Access Plus (Gold Open Access)” basis. Where an author
does not opt-in to this paid service, then the author’s
article will be published only on Bentham Science’s standard
subscription-based access, at no additional cost to the
author.
Authors who select the “Quick Track” publication option and
also wish to have their article made available on an “Open
Access Plus (Gold Open Access)” basis will be entitled to a
50% discount on the “Open Access Plus (Gold
Open Access)” publication fee.
For more information please contact us at e-mail: [email protected]
Bentham Science offers a 50% discount off the Open Access
Plus (Gold Open Access) Fee for manuscripts of all
corresponding authors who reside in countries which are
categorized as low-income economies by the World Bank. To
see if you qualify to the discount, please refer to the
complete list of these countries click
here.
REPRINTS
Printed reprints and e-prints may be ordered from the
Publisher prior to publication of the article. First named
authors may also order a personal print and online
subscription of the journal at 50% off the normal
subscription rate by contacting the subscription department
at e-mail: [email protected].
ANIMATED ABSTRACTS
Extend the scope and visibility of your research by creating an
animated abstract. Bentham Science has collaborated with Focus
Medica, one of the world’s largest publishers of expert animated
atlases and videos in medicine and science.
An animated abstract will help summarise the essential
discoveries/ key findings of your published research or review
article. Each professionally produced full-coloured animated
abstract in video format (length 3 – 5 minutes) is accompanied
by an English spoken or foreign language commentary. The
animated abstract will be published online along with the
published article.
The payment for an animated abstract will be US$ 950
for English language, and US$ 1450 for Foreign
language articles. Initially, an advance amount of US$ 500
will be payable to the Publisher to start work on the Animated
Abstract, while the balance of US$ 450 (English
language) or US$ 950 (Foreign language) will be
payable on completion of the Animated Abstract.
Authors who opt for the “Animated Abstract” option and also wish
to have their article made available on an “Open Access Plus
(Gold Open Access)” basis will be entitled to a 50% discount
only on the Animated Abstract fee and, in addition, pay the
normal Open Access Plus (Gold Open Access) fee.
Authors will be asked whether they wish to opt-in for this paid
animated abstract service, and if not, the article will be
published as normal. Animated abstracts are available as open
access (free viewing) for maximum visibility and awareness to
readers at anytime, anywhere. The animated abstracts are
licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution –
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC
BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
For a sample of an animated abstract please access here https://www.benthamscience.com/pages/animated-abstract-video
SPECIAL DISCOUNTS
Bentham Science offers discounts to those corresponding authors
who are based in low-income countries*.
The authors who wish to avail this offer should request for a
discount at the time of submission of their manuscripts to
Bentham Science.
Eligibility:
Bentham Science offers 50% discount on the Open Access Plus
(Gold Open Access) Fee, Quick Track Fee and Article
Processing Charges (APC) for manuscripts of the
corresponding authors based in countries categorized as
low-income economies by World Bank (list given below).
For any query or suggestion, please contact us on [email protected].
List of Countries*
- Afghanistan
- Benin
- Burundi
- Central African Republic
- Congo, Rep.
- Eritrea
- Georgia
- Guinea-Bissau
- Iraq
- Kosovo
- Liberia
- Marshall Islands
- Mongolia
- Nepal
- Paraguay
- Sierra Leone
- Sudan
- Tajikistan
- Tonga
- Yemen, Rep.
- Albania
- Bhutan
- Cambodia
- Chad
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Ethiopia
REVIEWING AND PROMPTNESS OF PUBLICATION
All papers submitted for publication are immediately subjected to
preliminary editorial scrutiny by the Editor-in-Chief regarding
their suitability. The Editor-in-Chief determines if the
manuscript
(a) falls within the scope of the journal and
(b) meets the editorial criteria of Bentham Science
Publishers in terms of originality and quality.
Manuscripts that appear to be suitable are then subjected to
single-blind peer-review by, usually three, neutral eminent
experts. The services of eminent international experts are
sought through invitations to conduct the peer-review of a
submitted manuscript, keeping in view the scope of the
manuscript and the expertise of the reviewers. The identity of
the reviewers is not disclosed to the authors. The anonymity of
reviewers ensures objective and unbiased assessment of the
manuscript by the reviewers.
Before sending the manuscripts to reviewers, Bentham
Science seeks consent from potential reviewers
about their availability and willingness to review.
Correspondence between the editorial office of the journal and
the reviewers is kept confidential. The reviewers are expected
to provide their reports in a timely fashion since a prompt
review leads to timely publication of a manuscript which is
beneficial not only to the authors but to the scientific
community as well.
The editorial process and peer-review workflow for each journal
are taken care of by a team of Senior Editors, Editorial Board
Members (EBMs) and dedicated Journal managers who have the
required expertise in their specific fields.
Bentham Science Publishers carries out independent review of all
articles. The reviewers are selected according to their
expertise, from our, regularly updated, referee database.
On the basis of reviewer comments, the Editors may recommend
acceptance, revision or rejection of a manuscript.
After review of the manuscript by at least three independent
experts, in addition to the views of the Editor, the decision is
relayed to the authors, which may be categorized as:
Requires minor changes
Requires major changes
Rejected but may be resubmitted
Rejected with no resubmission
Bentham Science requests not to have the
manuscripts peer-reviewed by those experts who may have
competing interest with the author(s) of a submitted manuscript.
It is not possible for Editors to be aware of all competing
interests; it is therefore expected that the reviewers would
inform the Editor-in-Chief/Handling Editor if they notice any
potential competing interest during the course of review of a
manuscript. Moreover, the reviewers are expected to inform the
Editors or editorial office of the journal if they have a
conflict of interest in carrying out the review of a manuscript
submitted by any author/contributor of the manuscript.
The authors are usually requested to resubmit the revised paper
within 15 days and it will then be returned to the reviewers for
further evaluation. The publishers normally allow one round of
revision and, in exceptional cases, a second round of revision
may be allowed. If further revision is needed, then the
manuscript is rejected and the author is requested to resubmit
the manuscript for fresh processing.
The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection is that of
the Editor-in-Chief, depending on the quality of the revision
and his assessment of the quality of the manuscript. In rare
cases, manuscripts recommended for publication by the referees
may be rejected in the final assessment by the Editor-in-Chief.
Papers which are delayed by the authors in revision for more than
30 days are required to be re-submitted as a new submission.
Papers accepted for publication are typeset and proofs are
dispatched to authors for any corrections prior to final
publication.
PLAGIARISM PREVENTION
Bentham Science Publishers uses the iThenticate software which detects instances of
overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. This
software checks content against a database of periodicals, the
Internet, and a comprehensive article database. It generates a
similarity report, highlighting the percentage overlap between
the uploaded article and the published material. Any instance of
content overlap is further scrutinized for suspected plagiarism
according to the publisher’s Editorial Policies. If the
similarity seems legitimate, the article will be proceeded for
further review process; however, in cases of superfluous
plagiarism, the authors have to revise the text as per editorial
instructions.
Bentham Science Publishers strictly follows the COPE guidelines
to detect plagiarism; for more clear insight, authors may refer
to flowcharts provided by COPE by clicking
here or by visiting COPE website.
Low Text Similarity
The text of every submitted manuscript is checked by using
the Content Tracking mode in iThenticate. The Content
Tracking mode ensures that manuscripts with an overall low
percentage similarity (but which may have a higher
similarity from a single source) are not overlooked. If the
similarity level is significantly high, then the manuscript
is returned to the author for paraphrasing the text and
citing the original source of the copied material.
It is important to mention that the text taken from different
sources with an overall low similarity percentage will be
considered as a plagiarized content if the majority of the
article is a combination of copied material.
High Text Similarity
There may be some manuscripts with an overall low similarity
percentage, but a higher percentage from a single source.
For instance, a manuscript may have less than 20% overall
similarity but there may be 15 % similar text taken from a
single article; the similarity index in such cases is higher
than the approved limit for a single source. Authors are
advised to thoroughly rephrase the similar text and properly
cite the original source to avoid plagiarism and copyright
violation.
Types of Plagiarism
We all know that scholarly manuscripts are written after a
thorough review of previously published articles. It is
therefore, not easy to draw a clear boundary between
legitimate representation and plagiarism. However, the
following important features can assist in identifying
different kinds of plagiarized content. These are:
Reproduction of others words, sentences, ideas or
findings as one’s own without proper
acknowledgement.
Text recycling, also known as self-plagiarism. It is
an author’s use of a previous publication in another
paper without proper citation and acknowledgment of
the original source.
Paraphrasing poorly: Copying complete paragraphs and
modifying a few words without changing the structure
of original sentences or changing the sentence
structure but not the words.
Verbatim copying of text without putting quotation
marks and not acknowledging the work of the original
author.
Properly citing a work but poorly paraphrasing the
original text is considered as unintentional
plagiarism. Similarly, manuscripts with language
somewhere between paraphrasing and quoting are not
acceptable. Authors should either paraphrase
properly or quote and in both cases, cite the
original source.
Higher similarity in the abstract, introduction,
materials and methods, and discussion and conclusion
sections indicates that the manuscript may contain
plagiarized text. Authors can easily explain these
parts of the manuscript in many ways. However,
technical terms and sometimes standard procedures
cannot be rephrased; therefore Editors must review
these sections carefully before making a decision.
Plagiarism in Published Manuscripts
Published manuscripts which are found to contain plagiarized
text are retracted from the journal website after careful
investigation and approval by the Editor-in-Chief of the
journal. A ‘Retraction Note’ as well as a link to the
original article is published on the electronic version of
the plagiarized manuscript and an addendum with retraction
notification in the journal concerned.
For further details, please visit: https://www.benthamscience.com/research-misconduct
GAIN MORE PUBLICATION REACH AND IMPACT KUDOS
Bentham Science is a publishing partner of Kudos. All authors who
publish in this journal will receive an invitation to join the
Kudos platform, an entirely free service for authors. Kudos
enables authors to help broaden their audience and readers,
increase their professional profile and reputation, and
establish an impact for their publications. The website link is
www.growkudos.com.
Kudos provides a free platform to researchers to have their
publications accessible, read and cited across multiple networks
and channels available to researchers for the dissemination of
their work. It takes on average 15 minutes and leads to 23%
higher growth in full-text downloads.
Authors are encouraged to explain their work in clear English and
to attract researchers of the relevant communities, share a
trackable link that you can email to your existing network of
contacts, or share on social media and academic websites, and
track how well the articles are performing through the summary
of views, downloads, citations, and altmetrics on the Kudos
dashboard.
Authors may also use the new shareable PDF (S-PDF) service. The
S-PDF provides researchers with the means to write and share a
high-level overview for each of their publications. Kudos
thereby provides researchers, and their publishers and
institutions, with a rich understanding of which channels and
activities are most effective for broadening the reach and
impact of published science.
E-PUB AHEAD OF SCHEDULE
Bentham Science Publishers is pleased to offer electronic
publication of accepted papers prior to scheduled publication.
These peer-reviewed papers can be cited using the date of access
and the unique DOI number. Any final changes in manuscripts will
be made at the time of print publication and will be reflected
in the final electronic version of the issue. Articles ahead of
schedule may be ordered by pay-per-view at the relevant links by
each article stated via the E-Pub
Ahead of Schedule
Disclaimer
Articles appearing in E-Pub Ahead-of-Schedule sections have
been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in this
journal and posted online before scheduled publication.
Articles appearing here may contain statements, opinions,
and information that have errors in facts, figures, or
interpretation. Accordingly, Bentham Science Publishers, the
editors and authors and their respective employees are not
responsible or liable for the use of any such inaccurate or
misleading data, opinion or information contained of
articles in the E-Pub Ahead-of-Schedule.
APPEALS AND COMPLAINTS
Generally, the editorial decisions are not reverted. However,
authors who think that their manuscript was rejected due to a
misunderstanding or mistake may seek an explanation for the
decision. Appeals must give sound reasoning and compelling
evidence against the criticism raised in the rejection letter. A
difference of opinion as to the interest, novelty, or
suitability of the manuscript for the journal will not be
considered as an appeal. The EIC and other relevant editors will
consider the appeal and the decision thereafter taken by the
journal will be deemed final. Acceptance of the manuscript is
not guaranteed even if the journal agrees to reconsider the
manuscript, and the reconsideration process may involve previous
or new reviewers or editors and substantive revision.
Authors who wish to make a complaint should refer them to the
Editor-in-Chief of the journal concerned. Complaints to the
Publisher may be emailed to [email protected]