Generic placeholder image

Current Rheumatology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3971
ISSN (Online): 1875-6360

Review Article

Stairway to Heaven: Do head-to-head Trials Indicate a Need for Definite Criteria for Choosing Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Author(s): Senol Kobak*

Volume 19, Issue 4, 2023

Published on: 22 May, 2023

Page: [408 - 419] Pages: 12

DOI: 10.2174/1573397119666230427112617

Price: $65

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease characterized by joint and systemic involvement that develops with different pathogenetic mechanisms. Treatment of the disease is undertaken with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The mechanisms of action of conventional DMARDs generally are based on the inhibition of T and B-cells in the immune system. In recent years, biologic and targeted smart molecules have been used in the treatment of RA. Targeting different cytokines and inflammatory pathways, these drugs have ushered in a new era in RA treatment. The efficacy of these drugs has been demonstrated in many studies; and in the postmarketing period, that is, as the patients who use them say, they are like a “stairway to heaven”. However, as every "road to heaven” is challenging and “thorny”, the efficacy and reliability of these drugs and whether any one of them is superior to the others, remains a matter of debate. However, the use of biologic drugs with or without cDMARDs, the preference for original vs. biosimilar molecules, and discontinuation of the drugs after achieving sustained remission are other questions that need to be explored. When it comes to the choice of biological drugs by rheumatologists, it is not yet clear on which criteria they base their choices on. Due to the limited comparative studies of these biological drugs, the subjective criteria of the physician gains importance. The selection of these drugs, however, should be based on objective criteria such as efficacy, safety, superiority over each other, and cost. In other words, the determinant of the "path to heaven" should be based on objective criteria and recommendations according to the scientific data generated by controlledprospective studies, not on the initiative of a single physician.

In this review, a head-to-head comparison of biological drugs used in the treatment of RA, their efficacy, safety, and which are superior are discussed in light of recent literature data.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, biologics, head-to-head, criteria, DMARDs, disease.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Uhlig T, Moe RH, Kvien TK. The burden of disease in rheumatoid arthritis. PharmacoEconomics 2014; 32(9): 841-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0174-6] [PMID: 24859304]
[2]
Finckh A, Liang MH, van Herckenrode CM, de Pablo P. Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55(6): 864-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.22353] [PMID: 17139662]
[3]
Strand V, Singh JA. Improved health-related quality of life with effective disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Evidence from randomized controlled trials. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14(4): 234-54.
[PMID: 18415967]
[4]
Nam JL, Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, et al. Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(3): 516-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204577] [PMID: 24399231]
[5]
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75(1): 3-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524] [PMID: 25969430]
[6]
Fonseca Peixoto R, Ewerton Maia Rodrigues C, Henrique de Sousa Palmeira P, Cézar Comberlang Queiroz Davis dos Santos F, Keesen de Souza Lima T, de Sousa Braz A. Immune hallmarks of rheumatoid arthritis management: A brief review. Cytokine 2022; 158: 156007.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2022.156007] [PMID: 35985174]
[7]
Castro CT, Queiroz MJ, Albuquerque FC, et al. Real-world effectiveness of biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 927179.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.927179] [PMID: 36034836]
[8]
van der Velde G, Pham B, Machado M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of biologic response modifiers compared to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63(1): 65-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.20338] [PMID: 20740606]
[9]
Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Jonas BL, Thieda P, Lohr KN. The comparative efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 2006; 33(12): 2398-408.
[PMID: 17225293]
[10]
Pang M, Sun Z, Zhang H. Biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs and the risk of all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2022; 101(32): e29838.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029838] [PMID: 35960132]
[11]
Uhrenholt L, Christensen R, Dinesen WKH, et al. Risk of flare after tapering or withdrawal of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2022; 61(8): 3107-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab902] [PMID: 34864896]
[12]
Letarouilly JG, Salmon JH, Flipo RM. Factors affecting persistence with biologic treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20(9): 1087-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2021.1924146] [PMID: 33926364]
[13]
Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(6): 683-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00049-8] [PMID: 9250266]
[14]
Singh JA. Treatment guidelines in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2022; 48(3): 679-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2022.03.005] [PMID: 35953230]
[15]
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79(6): 685-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655] [PMID: 31969328]
[16]
Kuwana M, Tamura N, Yasuda S, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Three approaches with a cohort simulation and real-world data. Mod Rheumatol 2022; 33(2): 302-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mr/roac038] [PMID: 35445720]
[17]
Kim H, Cho SK, Choi S, et al. Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and medical costs between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13: 1759720X211024830.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211024830]
[18]
Jacobs JWG, Verhoeven MMA, Welsing PMJ. Unravelling the cost of biological strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: a kaleidoscope of methodologies, interpretations, and interests. J Rheumatol 2021; 48(12): 1771-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201510] [PMID: 33993116]
[19]
Holbrook J, Lara-Reyna S, Jarosz-Griffiths H, McDermott M. Tumour necrosis factor signalling in health and disease. F1000Res 2019; 8(F1000 Faculty Rev): 111.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17023.1]
[20]
Kondo N, Kuroda T, Kobayashi D. Cytokine networks in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22(20): 10922.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010922] [PMID: 34681582]
[21]
Bek S, Bojesen AB, Nielsen JV, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Pharmacogenetics of anti-TNF treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics J 2017; 17(5): 403-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2017.26] [PMID: 28607508]
[22]
Radner H, Aletaha D. Anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis: An overview. Wien Med Wochenschr 2015; 165(1-2): 3-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-015-0344-y] [PMID: 25651945]
[23]
Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson IF, Saxne T. Etanercept, infliximab, and leflunomide in established rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical experience using a structured follow up programme in southern Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61(9): 793-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.61.9.793] [PMID: 12176803]
[24]
Singh JA, Christensen R, Wells GA, et al. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: An overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Libr 2012; 2: 1-79.
[25]
Donahue KE, Gartlehner G, Jonas DE, et al. Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness and harms of disease-modifying medications for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(2): 124-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00192] [PMID: 18025440]
[26]
Wallis RS, Broder MS, Wong JY, Hanson ME, Beenhouwer DO. Granulomatous infectious diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38(9): 1261-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/383317] [PMID: 15127338]
[27]
Lee JH, Slifman NR, Gershon SK, et al. Life-threatening histoplasmosis complicating immunotherapy with tumor necrosis factor? antagonists infliximab and etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46(10): 2565-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.10583] [PMID: 12384912]
[28]
Slifman NR, Gershon SK, Lee JH, Edwards ET, Braun MM. Listeria monocytogenes infection as a complication of treatment with tumor necrosis factor? -neutralizing agents. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48(2): 319-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.10758] [PMID: 12571839]
[29]
Nakayama Y, Watanabe R, Murakami K, et al. Differential efficacy of TNF inhibitors with or without the immunoglobulin fragment crystallizable (Fc) portion in rheumatoid arthritis: The ANSWER cohort study. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42(7): 1227-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05086-w] [PMID: 35266034]
[30]
Albert DA. Are All Biologics the Same? Optimal Treatment Strategies for Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 2015; 21(8): 398-404.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000272] [PMID: 26226612]
[31]
Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Combe B, et al. Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study. Lancet 2016; 388(10061): 2763-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31651-8] [PMID: 27863807]
[32]
Sakai R, Cho SK, Nanki T, et al. Head-to-head comparison of the safety of tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA) in clinical practice: Results from the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) registry. Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17(1): 74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0583-8] [PMID: 25880658]
[33]
Gabay C, Emery P, van Vollenhoven R, et al. Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): A randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet 2013; 381(9877): 1541-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60250-0] [PMID: 23515142]
[34]
Taylor PC, Schiff M, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab, an anti-IL-6 cytokine monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a global, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016; 68: 3222. [abstract]. [SURROUND-H].
[35]
Kennedy WP, Simon JA, Offutt C, et al. Efficacy and safety of pateclizumab (anti-lymphotoxin-α) compared to adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: A head-to-head phase 2 randomized controlled study (The ALTARA Study). Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16(5): 467.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-014-0467-3] [PMID: 25359150]
[36]
Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Valente R, et al. Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: Two-year efficacy and safety findings from AMPLE trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(1): 86-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203843] [PMID: 23962455]
[37]
Fleischmann R, Weinblatt M, Ahmad H, et al. Efficacy of abatacept and adalimumab in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis with multiple poor prognostic factors: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial (AMPLE). Rheumatol Ther 2019; 6(4): 559-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-00174-7] [PMID: 31642045]
[38]
Burmester GR, Lin Y, Patel R, et al. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(5): 840-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310] [PMID: 27856432]
[39]
Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Bessette L, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results through 3 years from the SELECT-COMPARE study. RMD Open 2022; 8(1): e002012.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002012] [PMID: 35121639]
[40]
Mysler E, Tanaka Y, Kavanaugh A, et al. Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE. Rheumatology 2022; keac477. Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac477] [PMID: 36018230]
[41]
Cacciapaglia F, Venerito V, Stano S, Fornaro M, Lopalco G, Iannone F. Comparison of adalimumab to other targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med 2022; 12(3): 353.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030353] [PMID: 35330353]
[42]
Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, et al. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(3): 617-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.33383] [PMID: 21952978]
[43]
Ogata A, Tanimura K, Sugimoto T, et al. Phase III study of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2014; 66(3): 344-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22110] [PMID: 23983039]
[44]
Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376(7): 652-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608345] [PMID: 28199814]
[45]
Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Tanaka Y, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 study of baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Secondary analyses from the RA-BEAM study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(11): 1853-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211259]
[46]
Schiff M, Keiserman M, Codding C, et al. Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: A phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67(8): 1096-103.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.080002] [PMID: 18055472]
[47]
van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367(6): 508-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112072] [PMID: 22873531]
[48]
Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Furst D, et al. Efficacy and safety of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitor therapy: Outcomes of a randomised Phase IIb study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(9): 1607-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204760] [PMID: 24641941]
[49]
Smolen JS, Feist E, Fatenejad S, et al. Olokizumab versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2022; 387(8): 715-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2201302] [PMID: 36001712]
[50]
Weinblatt ME, McInnes IB, Kremer JM, et al. A randomized phase ii b study of mavrilimumab and golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018; 70(1): 49-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.40323] [PMID: 28941039]
[51]
Emery P, Rondon J, Parrino J, et al. Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous sarilumab and intravenous tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2019; 58(5): 849-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key361] [PMID: 30590833]
[52]
Emery P, Hoogstraten H, Thangavelu K, Mangan E, St John G, Verschueren P. Subcutaneous sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who previously received subcutaneous sarilumab or intravenous tocilizumab: An open‐label extension of a randomized clinical trial. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020; 2(11): 672-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11188] [PMID: 33164349]
[53]
Porter D, van Melckebeke J, Dale J, et al. Tumour necrosis factor inhibition versus rituximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who require biological treatment (ORBIT): An open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority, trial. Lancet 2016; 388(10041): 239-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00380-9] [PMID: 27197690]
[54]
Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): A phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390(10093): 457-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31618-5] [PMID: 28629665]
[55]
Takahashi N, Kojima T, Kaneko A, et al. Clinical efficacy of abatacept compared to adalimumab and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 33(1): 39-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2392-2] [PMID: 24057092]
[56]
Chen YC, Chiu WC, Su FM, Chen JF. Generalized estimating equation model to compare drug effects on synovitis of the dominant wrist in severe rheumatoid arthritis between tocilizumab versus adalimumab versus abatacept using high-resolution ultrasound. Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21(9): 1695-700.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13188] [PMID: 29024421]
[57]
Rubbert-Roth A, Enejosa J, Pangan AL, et al. Trial of upadacitinib or abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(16): 1511-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2008250] [PMID: 33053283]
[58]
Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 2018; 320(13): 1360-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13103] [PMID: 30285183]
[59]
Curtis JR, Fox KM, Xie F, et al. The Economic Benefit of Remission for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9(5): 1329-45. Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-022-00473-6] [PMID: 35834162]
[60]
Foo J, Morel C, Bergman M, et al. Cost per response for abatacept versus adalimumab in patients with seropositive, erosive early rheumatoid arthritis in the US, Germany, Spain, and Canada. Rheumatol Int 2019; 39(9): 1621-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04352-2] [PMID: 31240388]
[61]
Neubauer AS, Minartz C, Herrmann KH, Baerwald CGO. Cost-effectiveness of early treatment of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients with abatacept. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018; 36(3): 448-54.
[PMID: 29303709]
[62]
Brkic A, Diamantopoulos AP, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Exploring drug cost and disease outcome in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in Norway in 2010-2019-a country with a national tender system for prescription of costly drugs. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22(1): 48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07425-w] [PMID: 35012522]
[63]
Carlson JJ, Ogale S, Dejonckheere F, Sullivan SD. Economic evaluation of tocilizumab monotherapy compared to adalimumab monotherapy in the treatment of severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health 2015; 18(2): 173-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.013] [PMID: 25773552]
[64]
Park DJ, Choi SJ, Shin K, et al. Switching profiles in a population-based cohort of rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic therapy: Results from the KOBIO registry. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 36(5): 1013-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3584-y] [PMID: 28243760]
[65]
Gibofsky A, Skup M, Yang M, Mittal M, Macaulay D, Ganguli A. Short-term costs associated with non-medical switching in autoimmune conditions. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019; 37(1): 97-105.
[PMID: 29998841]
[66]
Crosby M, Tadrous M, Gomes T. Potential cost implications of mandatory non‐medical switching policies for biologics for rheumatic conditions and inflammatory bowel disease in Canada. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 109(3): 739-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2042] [PMID: 32909249]
[67]
van Vollenhoven R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 15(3): 180-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41584-019-0170-5]
[68]
Choy E, Aletaha D, Behrens F, et al. Monotherapy with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Table 1. Rheumatology 2016; 56(5): kew271.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew271] [PMID: 27550301]
[69]
Jørgensen TS, Kristensen LE, Christensen R, et al. Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry. Rheumatology 2015; 54(12): kev216.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev216] [PMID: 26175471]
[70]
Emery P, Pope JE, Kruger K, et al. Efficacy of monotherapy with biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther 2018; 35(10): 1535-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0757-2] [PMID: 30128641]
[71]
Hazlewood GS, Barnabe C, Tomlinson G, Marshall D, Devoe D, Bombardier C. Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: Abridged Cochrane systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 353: i1777.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1777] [PMID: 27102806]
[72]
Jung EH, Sarpatwari A, Kesselheim AS, Sinha MS. FDA and EMA biosimilar approvals. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35(6): 1908-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05408-6] [PMID: 31637641]
[73]
Gherghescu I, Delgado-Charro MB. The biosimilar landscape: an overview of regulatory approvals by the EMA and FDA. Pharmaceutics 2020; 13(1): 48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010048] [PMID: 33396369]
[74]
Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: The PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72(10): 1613-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090] [PMID: 23687260]
[75]
Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, et al. Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(2): 355-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208786] [PMID: 27130908]
[76]
Combe B, Allanore Y, Alten R, et al. Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous (CT-P13) and intravenous infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-regression of individual patient data from two randomised trials. Arthritis Res Ther 2021; 23(1): 119.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02487-x] [PMID: 33863352]
[77]
Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76(1): 51-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588] [PMID: 26150601]
[78]
Jaworski J, Matucci-Cerinic M, Schulze-Koops H, et al. Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21(1): 130.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x] [PMID: 31138316]
[79]
Tanaka E, Kawahito Y, Kohno M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2022; 32(1): 74-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2021.1899591] [PMID: 33706664]
[80]
Genovese MC, Glover J, Greenwald M, et al. FKB327, an adalimumab biosimilar, versus the reference product: Results of a randomized, Phase III, double-blind study, and its open-label extension. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21(1): 281.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2046-0] [PMID: 31831079]
[81]
Genovese MC, Kellner H, Arai Y, Muniz R, Alten R. Long-term safety, immunogenicity and efficacy comparing FKB327 with the adalimumab reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Data from randomised double-blind and open-label extension studies. RMD Open 2020; 6(1): e000987.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000987] [PMID: 32371430]
[82]
Wiland P, Jeka S, Dokoupilová E, et al. Switching to biosimilar SDZ-ADL in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: 48-Week efficacy, safety and immunogenicity results from the phase III, randomized, double-Blind ADMYRA study. BioDrugs 2020; 34(6): 809-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-020-00447-6] [PMID: 33119861]
[83]
Lee S, Lee H, Kim E. Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar rituximab and originator rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BioDrugs 2019; 33(5): 469-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-019-00376-z] [PMID: 31446557]
[84]
Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P, et al. Biosimilars for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: Economic considerations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 11(sup1)(Suppl. 1): 43-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/1744666X.2015.1090313] [PMID: 26395836]
[85]
Patel D, Shelbaya A, Cheung R, Aggarwal J, Park SH, Coindreau J. Cost-effectiveness of early treatment with originator biologics or their biosimilars after methotrexate failure in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Ther 2019; 36(8): 2086-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00986-7] [PMID: 31148057]
[86]
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Smolen JS, et al. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79(6): 744-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216656] [PMID: 32033937]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy